Litigate Or Mediate?: Mediation As An Alternative To Lawsuits

Scrie un comentariu

Martie 19, 2012 prin Autorul


One often hears the term „mediation” in connection with resolution of disputes which have already become lawsuits, and, occasionally, before those lawsuits are filed. Mediation is a process by which a neutral third party called a Mediator hears a dispute between two or more parties and attempts to help the parties settle their dispute without judging the merits of the case. The term „mediation” is often confused with the term „arbitration.” Arbitration is another form of dispute resolution by a third party (as opposed to a trial before a judge or jury). The Arbitrator listens to the evidence presented by each party and then makes a judgment as to who is responsible for the claimant’s damages, and how much the responsible person must pay to the claimant, if any payment is due.


Mediators range in training from practicing attorneys, retired judges or other professionals to highly trained mediators who work full or part time in the specialized field of mediation.The right mediator for your case is one who demonstrates overriding neutrality in evaluating and resolving your case. The effective mediator will help the parties recognize the strengths and weaknesses of both sides’ case, so that at the end of mediation both parties are reasonably satisfied with the outcome. The effective mediator will also help parties consider the risks and costs of resolving a dispute before a judge or jury, without necessarily meeting the expectations of either party.


Ninety-five percent of cases filed in the California court system settle before trial. Some settle early, others settle on the eve of trial or as close as after a jury is picked. The difference between the former and the latter is the amount of money and time a party will spend in getting from one point to the other. Depending on the type of case, the cost could range from hundreds to several thousands of dollars. Often, the costs are not recovered at the time of settlement. Thus both parties bear their own burden of costs.

Mediating a case before a lawsuit is filed enables the parties to present their case to a mutually selected neutral person (or in some cases two persons as co-mediators) before any money is spent on litigation. Many times the simple process of telling one’s story to a neutral willing to listen will take the parties a long way toward settlement. The cost of mediating a case (which can be as little as a few hundred dollars, or as much as several thousand dollars per day) is minimal compared to the costs incurred through the life of a lawsuit.


In some cases, contracts between the parties require that a case be mediated and/or arbitrated. This is often occurs in medical malpractice actions, construction contracts, and real estate purchase agreement. In some cases statutes require pre-litigation mediationor alternative dispute resolution, such as in most types of homeowners association disputes. The excessive backlog in court calendars makes mediation an attractive alternative in other types of cases, resulting in the resolution of disputes in a timely manner, and avoiding the painstaking experience of costly litigation lasting up to five years.


If you have a dispute with another person or business, which you want resolved, you can first propose to the other side to mediate the case. If you are uncomfortable with that option, then you can make the first call to the mediator and ask the mediator to approach the other side with the invitation to mediate. A well-trained mediator can effectively maintain his or her neutrality during this process.

If you are not familiar with any mediators, you can call the local court and ask for potentialmediators, or you can call your local bar association which often has a panel of mediators. Other possible sources are the Internet, as well as private mediation companies.

Select a mediator who has some familiarity with the area of law of your dispute (i.e., homeowners associations, landlord/tenant, business practices, construction disputes, family law, etc.) and someone in your geographic area. Ask the mediator what his or her fees are, and how much time he or she will allocate to your dispute. A good mediator will commit as much time as is necessary to help you resolve your dispute.


In most states, what takes place in mediation is confidential. For example, in California, the mediator cannot be forced to testify at trial as to what was said in a mediation hearing. Any offers made during the mediation process, and any concessions made, are confidential if the case doesn’t settle. Of course, certain limitations do exist in connection with protecting others from danger or imminent harm, or in connection with illegal activities. But, parties to most typical disputes over money or negligent conduct are generally protected by laws of confidentiality.


The mediation process is as successful as the willingness of the parties to participate in good faith to reach a settlement. A good mediator will work with the parties until he or she determines that a settlement cannot be reached at the time. Parties who consider what they have learned during the mediation process often reach a settlement after the hearing in order to avoid spending precious time and additional funds which may never be recovered at trial.


Lasă un răspuns

Completează mai jos detaliile tale sau dă clic pe un icon pentru a te autentifica:


Comentezi folosind contul tău Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Fotografie Google+

Comentezi folosind contul tău Google+. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Poză Twitter

Comentezi folosind contul tău Twitter. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Fotografie Facebook

Comentezi folosind contul tău Facebook. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )


Conectare la %s




Cele mai bune articole și pagini

Despre mediere:


free counters
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src=%27 type=%27text/javascript%27%3E%3C/script%3E")); try {Histats.startgif(1,2078858,4,8006,""); Histats.track_hits();} catch(err){};

acord de confidentialitate Acord de mediere definitie alternativ arbitraj avantajele medierii in caz de divort avocat divort avocat si mediator beneficiu Bucuresti Cat castiga un mediator CAT COSTA DIVORTUL PRIN MEDIERE centru de mediere conflict consens consiliu de mediere Consiliul de Mediere Contract de mediere definitie Contractul de mediere cursuri de mediator cursuri mediere divort la mediator eficient informare de la Judecatorie informare mediere tribunal judecator Judecatoria Sectorului 1 Judecatoria Sectorului 2 Judecatoria Sectorului 3 Judecatoria Sectorului 4 Judecatoria Sectorului 5 Judecatoria Sectorului 6. judecatorie justitie litigiu masterate mediere mediator mediator autorizat Mediator autorizat de Consiliul de Mediere pentru activitati de mediere in Bucuresti Mediator divort mediator divort pret mediatori mediatorii mediator in Bucuresti mediator in cazul unui divort mediatori Romania mediator din Timisoara Mediator Judecatoria Sectorului 1 Mediator Judecatoria Sectorului 2 Mediator Judecatoria Sectorului 3 Mediator Judecatoria Sectorului 4 Mediator Judecatoria Sectorului 5 Mediator Judecatoria Sectorului 6. mediator profesionist mediator TimisoaraTabloul Mediatorilor medierea ca profesie mediere Timisoara negociere onorariu parchet politie pragmatism Primul Tablou al Mediatorilor proces proces-verbal de mediere procuror profesia de mediator profesii de viitor solutionare amiabila specializare Tabloul Mediatorilor Autorizati Tabloul Mediatorilor Bucuresti Tabloul Mediatorilor Profesionisti Tabloul mediatorilor romani Tarife divort prin acordul partilor la mediator tarife pentru divortul prin acordul partilor la mediator tribunal
%d blogeri au apreciat asta: